This page explains how pricing is structured for candidate intake, recruitment CRM, and combined workflow setups. The aim is clarity about scope, not artificial package complexity.
Team size is only one part of the price. Scope also depends on how candidate traffic arrives, how many desks and languages are involved, and how far the workflow runs from intake to recruiter action.
That is why the site shows starting points. A staffing agency that needs after-hours capture only is a different project from an agency that wants intake, pipeline, reminders, routing, and branch-level visibility connected in one system.
Projects expand in price when they include more branches, more markets, more handoff rules, or more workflow variation between desks. They also expand when the agency needs custom forms, reporting, or stricter operational logic around follow-up.
If the biggest pain is missed calls and delayed callbacks, start with intake. If the pain is scattered candidate management and weak visibility, start with CRM. If both are connected and harming performance together, the combined setup is usually the cleaner move.
The most useful pricing conversation starts with one question: where is recruiter time currently being wasted, and where are candidates being lost?
Related pages
Pricing overview for candidate intake, recruitment CRM, and combined staffing workflow implementations by AI JOB AGENCY.
AI JOB AGENCY
Pricing overview for candidate intake, recruitment CRM, and combined staffing workflow implementations by AI JOB AGENCY.
AI JOB AGENCY
Pricing overview for candidate intake, recruitment CRM, and combined staffing workflow implementations by AI JOB AGENCY.
AI JOB AGENCY
Pricing overview for candidate intake, recruitment CRM, and combined staffing workflow implementations by AI JOB AGENCY.
FAQ
This page explains how pricing is structured for candidate intake, recruitment CRM, and combined workflow setups. The aim is clarity about scope, not artificial package complexity.
No. They are realistic starting points. Final scope depends on workflow, team structure, language needs, and the depth of implementation.
Choose the combined setup when candidate intake and recruiter workflow problems are connected and fixing only one side would still leave operational leakage.
Yes. Many agencies start with the narrowest operational bottleneck and expand once the first layer is working reliably.
Yes. Additional language handling, routing logic, and market-specific workflow design can change implementation scope.
Start with the workflow
Tell us where candidates are getting lost or where recruiter admin is slowing the team down. We will outline a practical setup.